SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (29102)1/22/1999 10:11:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Right, JLA. You are certainly doing your country a big service, by reinforcing the stereotype of "military intelligence" as an oxymoron. You'll notice that there was a followup post, with information on the post-war evaluation of the effectiveness of the Patriot. You can't be bothered with stuff like that, though, right? The "integrity" of the initial line about "100% effectiveness" of the Patriots is all you need.

A March 1991 Army report to Congress stated that Patriot missiles had intercepted forty-five of the forty-seven Scuds at which they were fired. . . .

John Conyers, the Michigan Democrat who chairs the House Government Operations Committee and its legislation and national security subcommittee, challenged the Army's findings this spring after a five-month investigation. At an April 7 hearing, investigators from the General Accounting Office testified that the Army's Patriot performance data were incomplete, inconsistent, and did not substantiate even a revised Army claim -- released at the hearing -- of a 40 percent success rate over Israel and 70 percent over Saudi Arabia. Questioned by Conyers, Army witnesses said they had high confidence in only about ten Scud kills during Desert Storm. A Congressional Research Service analyst testified that, based on the Army's own criteria and data, he could only confirm that one Scud warhead had been destroyed. The Army has refused to declassify the full analysis of the Patriot's performance, despite Conyer's repeated requests.
( cjr.org

All the "integrity" you need right there, eh, JLA? Who cares about information, when you got your precious unit to exercise.