Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (29143)	1/22/1999 11:19:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

More pus. JLA

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (29143)	1/22/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

What about "saving social security"? Or did Bill just forgot to say "saving social security for my pork-barrel spending programs"? This is worse than what you accused Bush of, reneging on his no new taxes pledge? Clinton took the initiative to spend the money in this case, in fact, on Medicare which is not even in the same trust fund as SS or in the general revenue pool.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (29143)	1/22/1999 3:17:00 PM
From: John Lacelle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Hey Daniel, I agree that old Tricky Dick would not have survived a Senate trial. But then, he could not count on Democratic "unity" (the word is partisanship if you are a Republican) like Bill Clinton can. Lets face it...the Democrats are really good liars and are willing to throw themselves in front of a train to save their beloved Bubba. The fact is that Ken Starr caught Bill Clinton red handed in an obstruction/ perjury/witness tampering case. However, just as Marsha Clark and Christopher Darden faced the daunting task of convincing a mostly Black jury that O. J. Simpson was guilty of murder, the Republicans face the same task of convincing a confused public, and a partisan bunch of Democratic losers like Kennedy, Boxer, Schumer, Dodds, and the rest who had already decided "not guilty" before the case was presented. It does not matter though, Daniel. I would much rather lose the case but know in my heart what was right, than to resort to the kinds of cheap shots that the Democrats and their friends like Larry Flynt are relying upon to save Bill Clinton, America's "LIAR IN CHIEF". -john