SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ISLAND-ARC RESOURCES IAR-VSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VAUGHN who wrote (141)1/22/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: teevee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186
 
Vaughn,
I did not say that type II kimberlites are typically not economic. I stated that with Type II kimberlites, a high G-10 count, and lots of G-10s with compositions low in Ca and high in Cr (towardsJ-1), is not indicative of grade potential, as for example,with type I kimberlite.
I suggest you obtain a paper by J.J. Gurney entitled:
The Interpretation of the Major element compositions of Mantle Minerals in Diamond Exploration
J.J. Gurney, Paul Zweistra
Journal of Geochemical Exploration 53,(1995) pp293-309
regards,
teevee



To: VAUGHN who wrote (141)1/26/1999 12:20:00 AM
From: The Fix  Respond to of 186
 
Hello Vaughn, Teevee, Dave, Goalie, Andrew and others.

I've been lurking on this thread and really enjoy the Geo. talk guys! Keep it up, It's very educational. I firmly believe that IAR is the best leverage play in the NWT's going. These guys will no doubt be the swing company if and when SUF hits. KLA is not an options with it's float and paper shuffle.

Good luck to us all.....The Fix is in.

fIXER


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News