Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Devlin who wrote (3038)	1/22/1999 2:54:00 PM
From: see clearly now	Respond to of 8393

A clear summary with perspective..would make an interesting original statement to the thread! thanks, Arni

To: Don Devlin who wrote (3038)	1/22/1999 3:09:00 PM
From: E Haiken	Respond to of 8393

Don That is an excellent response. The only point on which I don't agree is the matter of risk. Because ECD has the enabling technology in at least 4 different fields, each of which, in my opinion, is worth more than the current market cap, I think the risk in minimal. From what I have heard about Tyler Lowery & Ken Baker, the risk is even less. I believe the rewards will be staggering.

To: Don Devlin who wrote (3038)	1/22/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: Ray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8393

Don Devlin, you and Haiken have summarized my sentiments exactly. I have made these observations here and on the Yahoo thread several times, but not so clearly as you have. It makes me a bit mad to see Stan so completely misunderstood. He has done a simply amazing job of keeping ECD afloat despite the very slow growth of the markets for his stellar developments. As for Joe Master, his insight and understanding of ECD and it's products is so shallow - nay, profoundly mistaken - that I truly pity him. Ray