Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moonray who wrote (16517)	1/23/1999 7:42:00 PM
From: M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

Moonray, please don't encourage Shane to come back anymore. That guy is a pied piper. Every time he starts enthusing the prospects for LSI, my eyes glaze over and I'm in for another thousand shares. Oh, and Rairden, if you are right, I'll be the first to sign up for your very insightful newsletter. Good luck to all this coming week. MFS

To: Moonray who wrote (16517)	1/24/1999 12:40:00 AM
From: Duane L. Olson	Respond to of 25814

O~~~o <Ggg> Amen from a few of us, Moonray!.. But Shane had all the fundamental info, and it was right on track until a certain little SE Asian crisis disrupted things a bit..wouldn't you agree?. For the future, do you remember when we had that discussion (with Shane) about the fact that a LOT of capital development was going to be deferred -- and that in the end, it would create a VERY positive supply/demand imbalance (in favor of the MU's, VLSI's, and ((ta da)) LSI's of this world)?.. Well, some of that is coming to pass. I think E! went into MU around 20 when Kurlak went negative...and the next batch of winners in the "Fab shortage" game has got to include VLSI (which I own) and LSI (which I wish I owned MORE of ) :-) So, old friend -- up from here?? tso