Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CMOZ, next cmgi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Qone0 who wrote (72)	1/22/1999 4:26:00 PM
From: Leroyt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 947

Robert, Ned is neither short nor long on CMOZ. He's only here because of his strong aversion toward CMOZ CEO Wilfred Shaw. The last time he owned shares in MISM was 1.5 to 2 years ago. Ned is ONLY here to harass Wilfred and (unfortunately) we shareholders. He is knowledgeable in the stock market as I believe he is either a former member of the management of MIS.V or closely associated with them. I have owned stock in this company for 4 or 5 years in earlier incarnations. ALL good business people have failures. MIS International (MISM) formerly MIS.V (Vancouver exchange) had had two false starts. Hopefully we'll get is right this time. I think we've got a good start in a GREAT business area! good luck to all CMOZ investors, leroyt

To: Qone0 who wrote (72)	1/22/1999 8:34:00 PM
From: Ned Land	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 947

Robert, let's set the record straight here: Leroy explains: ALL good business people have failures. In point of fact, all good business people have successes, and this company hasn't had one. As I said earlier, Wilfred Shaw has never had a single business success, either privately or with a public company. Leroyt further explains: MIS International (MISM) formerly MIS.V (Vancouver exchange) had had two false starts. Actually, it has had at least four since I was first a shareholder. First it was an auto-wrecker; then it was a videogame retailer; then it was an auto service franchisor; then it was a pretzel franchisor. Now, I guess because the Internet is is in vogue, it is in the internet business! In every instance, the stock goes up on huge volume and the imminent announcement of "good things." But the deal goes sideways in time, and the "management team" gets fired. Shaw then explains that they were to blame. Leroyt concludes: Hopefully we'll get is right this time. I think we've got a good start in a GREAT business area! This quote is very interesting. I've secretly suspected that Leroy is very close to Wilfred. Who's the "we" Leroy makes reference to here? Yeah, that's what I think. I am neither long nor short this stock. I'd like to short it but you never know what kind of tom-foolery might propel it still higher. Finally, contrary to what Leroyt explains, company do indeed announce how they propose to pay for their acquisitions. Anyone who's investment for a month knows that. The reason I asked the question is because I suspect the company has no money.