SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kolo55 who wrote (7333)1/22/1999 6:11:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf  Respond to of 27311
 
Paul, Interesting that you mention potential insider selling.

I had just pulled up the trades for December, and saw that the ex-CFO Dave Archibald had exercised options on 3 days, and on 2 of those days he had sold the exact number he'd exercised (15,143 and 4,353). He has 71,436 common remaining from the option exercise on the third day, in addition to previous holdings. The sales were for the higher exercise prices (around $6 and at $8.88, respectively), and the third day's were priced at $3.19 to $5. He'd still have a nice profit if he found he needed to flip those as well, or his much earlier exercises in the $3.50 range. Just a parallel observation, not that he's the one.

Rich



To: kolo55 who wrote (7333)1/22/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: I. N. Vester  Respond to of 27311
 
I doubt that CC sold their position from the
first tranche. I have not wanted to discuss this
because of the endless obsession with the terms
of conversion of the preferred. Zeev, Larry,
et. al. had a huge axe to grind, and I don't
really want to pour more gasoline on their fire.

I don't think anybody can prove what CC did or did
not do. They do not hold 5% of the stock so any
sales would probably not have to be reported. Since
they registered the shares already, I'm not sure if
there would be any way to verify whether or not
they had converted. Would any conversion itself
require an additional filing with the SEC (they
would never hit the 5% ownership threshold on
the common)?

But the number of outstanding series A preferred is
reported. The proxy statement did give us a count
of 7500 shares of prefered A, didn't it?

This would prove that they still held all the preferred
A shares. Since they dropped any variable conversion
of those shares (their only motivation for doing so was
to have vlnc pick up the option to go with them for the
second tranche - they gained absolutely nothing else in
exchange), they are 'stuck' with a fixed conversion.

Larry will probably claim that they already sold all
those shares short so they don't care. But in that
case we need to see a net increase of 1.5M on the short
interest to prove that they are currently delta
neutral on their first $7.5M investment.

Given that they still hold 1.5M shares long, that is
strong confirmation of the simplest theory as to
their outlook for the whole deal, namely that after
much DD, they were in July and remained in December
extremely constructive on the company and its chances
of producing significant rewards for its shareholders.
If that's what brought them into the deal, it's quite
likely that they are holding for long term gains, rather
than doing all the 20/20 hindsight trading Larry is so
good at.

I'm sure that all kinds of other theories can be
concocted and there may not be any way of proving
any of them wrong. Pls help me if I'm wrong about this,
but I'm not sure if we can glean anything about CC's
actions except for filings which might continue to
show that the 7500 preferred A shares are still
outstanding.