Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Master who wrote (3045)	1/22/1999 6:58:00 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8393

I continue to hold a position. I am long because of the stunning technology. I hope to god the infusion of new executives will have a positive effect. The observation regarding Wall Streets lack of confidence seems to be reflected in the market cap. Amazing how defensive members of this board are with respect to valid observations. This is a place to discuss companies. Part of what they do is make a profit, if they are effective. This company has yet to demonstrate that it has a clue how to profit from its technology. I think it is at least plausible that Ovshinskys skills are not in management but in technology. That would appear to be a valid observation based on the empirical data.

To: Joe Master who wrote (3045)	1/22/1999 11:05:00 PM
From: Ray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8393

Joe Master expounds his wisdom: "I think the market (which is where the scoreboard is) shows the trust and admiration of Stan in reality." "And ray on Yahoo you were so wrong and Digithead was so right on royalties it is hilarious. Your credibility is less than that of don the schill." Truly astounding nonsense. The market is, in a sense, the scoreboard - of yesterday or today - but you entirely miss (or deliberately ignore) the fact that nearly everyone here has the good sense to be invested in ECD for the future - it has never been a stock for immediate gains. If you are interested in immediate profits, please look elsewhere and spare us your shortsighted comments - which are almost useless from any standpoint. Digithead is right about royalties? Thanks for proving my point about your pitiful lack of understanding. Digithead is the character who also insisted repeatedly that ECD's patents have no value since they are listed at zero on their books! Jeeez - enlisting Digithead's statements on "your side" is the dumbest thing I have witnessed this year. Incidentally, I apologize to the rest of the folks here for engaging in personal commentary - though I believe nearly everyone agrees with me. I am simply irritated that this otherwise astute board is plagued by such idiocy.