Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (6596)	1/22/1999 6:33:00 PM
From: KM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10072

Are you always this pompous?

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (6596)	1/22/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: BBG	Respond to of 10072

>>>Stocks usually move in the OPPOSITE direction of the prevailing view of a thread.<<< Ken... May be true about this thread but doesn't apply to the DELL thread... check it out.... BBG

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (6596)	1/22/1999 7:14:00 PM
From: David Colvin	Respond to of 10072

The truthsayer is the enemy..... Does this include your laughable Q4 1998 $0.02 per share estimate (see below) you so abruptly posted here, along with an admonishment about wild bullish junk, as if you are the daddy and we are all unthinking cretins who should bow to your superior intellect....and your obviously, majorly flawed "model"? See your condescending, supercilious post below Ken....and listen to yourself talk: _____________________________________________________________________ My models show +.02 for the quarter.. You guys are making the same mistakes you make EVERY quarter. No one guesses low, and the expectations get raised on the thread. The one's who guessed .10 -> .11 cents, I would really like to see the analysis. If anyone cares, I'll list my assumptions going into the model in a later post. I doubt anyone will, since the analysis will be labelled as flawed because it doesn't meet your expectations. But the .10 -> .11 cent ones will be embraced... Reminds me of a time some time ago when Allen started questioning well researched numbers that Mike posted on his awesome home page, but let the wild bullish junk being posted go unchallenged.. Human nature will never, ever, change... Good luck!! _____________________________________________________________________ I'm going to say it again know-it-all! You never will. Dave

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (6596)	1/22/1999 8:01:00 PM
From: FuzzFace	Respond to of 10072

<One interesting thing to note: Stocks usually move in the OPPOSITE direction of the prevailing view of a thread.> Another interesting thing to note is this stock usually moves in the OPPOSITE direction of your latest view on this thread. And of mine. And don't ask me how that's possible.

To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (6596)	1/22/1999 10:36:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 10072

Just Thought I'd Check In Hey. I happen to catch the news release on IOM's earnings. Look's like IOM has a lot more problems ahead. What about this 40MB Flop! drive? Haven't heard anything about it in the press or in Photography magazines or on ZDNET or anything. Looks like it's sure 'nuff dead in the water. I wonder if Flop! will even reach the $28 Million total revenue target I predicted for 1999. From the looks of it, probably not. Oh well, Iomaniacs. Have fun. Don't let the Iomega Dreamland Love-in here die off simply because of yet another sucky Conference Call and resulting price collapse. ps. Sorry I haven't been around here lately. I've been extremely busy producing masses of Macromedia Flash content for a very big computer outfit's website. But I'll try to keep in touch more often. It's the least I can do.