Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Lawrence who wrote (3022)	1/23/1999 12:15:00 AM
From: Gary Brunet	Respond to of 5164

AMEN! John

To: John Lawrence who wrote (3022)	1/23/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: AMF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5164

RE:<< Whoever posted that is intent on driving down the value of Sungold shares, and reducing the credibility of Sungold management. >> You're at your stock and trade again - whipping up paranoia and trying to get investors to look anywhere but at management. The shares already have no value, despite all the your frequent postings about how great things are just about to happen; and as for the reducing the credibility of the likes of Kim Hart - well, I'm still laughing about that one. As for me and my motives - you are dead wrong. I would, however, like to see Hart face legal charges for past and present actions. If the best response the company can make is to say they know nothing about this (and that sounds like that patsy IR woman), this should tell investors that it's all been flim flam. An immediate and vigorous denial would have been the only acceptable - and honorable - response from Sungold. However, you can be sure they are consulting lawyers about how to diminish their liability - and issuing a denial would just get them in deeper legal doo doo. As for posters huffing and puffing about the bad manners of the Band to post this info. on SI on a Friday - wake up! What better place to communicate---they need to contain their liability, as well. Still, most posters here, will, I'm sure, focus on me as the big bad wolf. Remember that people (like Cheeky Kid) were ranting until the end that David Walsh was innocent, cancelling subscriptions to any media that questioned Bre-x, and generally huddling together in a conspiracy theory. This will be no different. It's why people like Hart and Banzinger go on to other projects.