Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Baker Street who wrote (5722)	1/23/1999 12:45:00 AM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

. I am sure that California's rules are very similar, if not identical>>>> Hmmmmmm..so you don't know what the rules are in CA and any statement that he violated them would be pure conjecture so if he were practicing in NY..which rule number and section would he have broken???? edit..oh I looked at your message again..i see you have posted a rule which subsection are you indicating would be a violation IF their rules are similiar ..which of course you admit you have no knowledge as to whether they are or are not similiar or exact as the rules of New York. and of course rules such as this if it were worded exactly the same for example "Conceal or knowingly fail to disclose that which the lawyer is required by law to reveal" would be dependent on the law in CA...and you would have to know the law in CA to know if he would fail to disclose