Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (207)	1/23/1999 2:27:00 AM
From: Jake V.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Red: can you tell me where I can get market depth info? TIA JakeV

To: Rocket Red who wrote (207)	1/23/1999 10:27:00 AM
From: LABMAN	Respond to of 5821

Red The Vancouver Investment Conf. starts tommorrow JAN 24-25 followed by the Cordellian. Andrew Muir of CC will be there, plus many other analysts and newletter writers , it certainly be interesting who gives this the second nod. Is there anyone on this thread who is attending the conference and provide us with an update. lm

To: Rocket Red who wrote (207)	1/23/1999 11:52:00 AM
From: 1king	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5821

Morning Red, I see we are getting an abundance of geo-info here...far too much to be of any real use. My second last post promise! I looked at the graphics and the first thing that comes to mind is small. We seem to be on the 50-100m scale in these sections, which leads me to believe that the last hole was inclined for hits in the 150m range. Quite a change in section from 11+50 to 12+00 but I can't read the northings to determine if they are offset at all (several holes have been projected to plane as well). If they are as indicated on the plan map then I would be somewhat confused by the apparent discordance of the geophysics with the mapped intrusion and more importantly the mineralization. It seems we are only getting a response from the extreme up-dip side??? Pictorially (not scale etc.) this looks much like the gross features from the Eastern Deeps (no economic comparison inferred), even has the granite dykes. I am surprised by the lack of geophysical response on each line, it certainly appears time to probe the holes and do a surface check while the loops are out. Even 200-300m HLEM (relatively cheap) could be of some benefit in the <100m delineation. The more I see here the more grass-roots level I think we are at in this play. No negative connotations just meaning there is a lot of pre/syn-drilling work that could/should be done here. Reading through the site I have more questions that answers: 1) Why are we talking about PGE's. Only one cursory mention and no supporting assay data from May (Is there???). 2)Where on the grid is 99-1 and what was its orientation 3)Borehole geophysics should have been completed on the first set of holes. Especially #2 which appears to be a clean miss. Lots of fun for NWI guys, always nice to be in the limelight and VERY glad to see there are still plenty of investors willing to get into exploration plays....keeps me in business;-) Best of luck to all...... 1King