Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (17010)	1/23/1999 10:55:00 AM
From: zonkie	Respond to of 26163

We're all going to miss you boxerguy. I know you wouldn't lie about something as serious as saying you are going to quit posting here. If you do decide to make just 1 more post before you quit would you try and back up one or two of the things you said in the post I am responding to? I'd like to see you do that just once before you go away to sulk again, you do realize of course that you have never provided 1 bit of evidence for anything you've ever claimed. z.......

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (17010)	1/23/1999 11:32:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

you should realize court is not si & the defense you must address is the defamation, libel & slander of aznt. Hey Spiiiiddeyyyyy!! Let's talk about who's being sued for defamation, libel and slander for SURE, shall we? Is there anything more you'd like to tell us about default? As for us, well, since nobody's paid us to do what we do--we merely disapprove of the way AZNT's run--and since Mikey'll be laughed outta court if he tries to claim we had anything at all to do with the Incidents in Vegas, I really don't think we have anything to worry about. Unlike you. You don't seem to care to discuss documentable insider violations. You decline to tell us whether you've ever signed any contract with AZNT apart from a distribution agreement. But I'm sure we can get these questions answered in court, should the AZNT Legal Team fail to deter Mike from this extremely perilous course of action. I continue to find it astonishing that you don't seem to realize that you have to prove the allegations you've been making for lo these many months. Too bad, Spidey, Mikey, you won't be able to do it.

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (17010)	1/23/1999 11:35:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

Oh, and by the way, Spidey: I've sent Mikey's affidavit to several lawyer friends, who asked incredulously: "You're saying the guy actually filed this thing in COURT???".

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (17010)	1/23/1999 11:37:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

...there is no rational reason for this group to attack our investment 24 hors a day with no interest. Ain't up to the Court to rule on our rationality, Spidey. You should, moreover, realize that a very large part of the reason we're here so consistently is that we have a great deal of contempt for you and your manipulative lies. You've threated several of us, Gary. And we don't like that one bit. It kinda encourages us to persevere.

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (17010)	1/23/1999 11:46:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

as for brokers who manipulates stocks i believe you should look closely at any action & sanctions from the sec & nasd. Oh yesssss, Spidey, I've seen Riley's emails to the SEC and other agencies; the ones about Kugler. I was wiping my eyes before I was halfway through. As were the intended recipients, I don't doubt. Unless they're fed up by now with that pest Riley. Has he ever got any action from any of the people he complains to? Didn't think so... That should tell him--and you--something, no?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (17010)	1/23/1999 2:48:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Spidey? Didja order rum or tequila? Maybe with a Thunderbird chaser? Been served yet? Got more clout than we do? Still hoping that damned waiter'll come back...

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (17010)	1/24/1999 2:58:00 AM
From: s martin	Respond to of 26163

"mike it will take between 30-60 day to sue" Why would it take that long? Is your Psychocop attorney still trying to locate his process server or is he waiting on the "freeze" to lift so he can see if his check clears ? <g>