SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wlheatmoon who wrote (44401)1/23/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike, Now you went and did it. Expect 223 notes from Paul Engel, you non-entity clown. <G>



To: wlheatmoon who wrote (44401)1/23/1999 7:29:00 PM
From: Earlie  Respond to of 132070
 
MKC:

Thanks for posting the article. It's appreciated. My, my, Big bad AMD bullying that nice Intel company. Tsk, tsk.
It all sounds rather familiar somehow. (g)

Note the last sentence,....."huge pricing war."

Best, Earlie



To: wlheatmoon who wrote (44401)1/23/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 132070
 
>>"It's a huge pricing war at this point," Ms. Henry said. <<

well, w/ intel's "stellar" results (a few % points better than 2 years ago), there must either be 50% unit sales growth or boxes be fillin' up some rooms somewhere...



To: wlheatmoon who wrote (44401)1/23/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: RealMuLan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
I think I read somewhere AMD claimed that the reason for their disappointed earning was because they could not produce enough chip to meeting the demand for holiday sale. In another word, if they could, their market share would be even higher.