Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (29424)	1/23/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: Harvey Allen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Starr's office also asked US District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson to revoke Lewinsky's immunity agreement against prosecution if she refuses to cooperate--thereby clearing the way for him to indict her for obstruction of justice for allegedly joining with Clinton to hide their secret sexual relationship from lawyers in the Paula Corbin Jones sexual harassment lawsuit. latimes.com

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (29424)	1/23/1999 1:56:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<with Chief Justice and liar under oath Rehnquist leading the way to the door. >> What is your problem with fellow Badger Rehnquist? Did his dog crap on your lawn or something?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (29424)	1/23/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Chief Justice and liar under oath Rehnquist Daniel: This assertion is slanderous and is a perfect example of why your posts, even the most articulate of them, cannot be taken seriously. If you could learn to write without the constant reversion to character assassination and slander, you would actually be able to debate with people, rather than just getting into pissing contests with them. -BLT

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (29424)	1/23/1999 6:35:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Respond to of 67261

Daniel, do you consider anyone who wants the President to answer to the same laws as the people as hating him? Or is that just some liberal retort in order to deflect from the real issue? Believe it or not Daniel, many people including myself who believe the President should be impeached do not hate him. I understand it makes for a nice little spin sound bite in the media. But paraphrasing Dan Rather never elevates your argument. :-) I realize it's a strange concept for Democrats that there are laws such as perjury. And people actually believe they should be defended. Even if it means impeaching your King and Queen. This President has destroyed any trust he is freely given by the people. He has dishonored and defamed our highest elected office. He has brought shame on his family and friends who supported him. And he cannot lead from this position. Leadership requires trust and trustworthiness to be effected. Do you honesty believe he can ever regain it with the American people? I almost choked up my tea the other night when he said during his speech that he "honored his wife!" What a classic! honored!!?? My wife would honor that kind of behavior with a swift kick to my groin! And I would deserve it. :-) How you can spend hours upon hours here every day defending this guy like he is a Jesus figure and you a worshipping robot, is beyond my comprehension. But I guess there are all kinds of people in this world Daniel. :-) Or perhaps you're hoping to be the next invited guest to the oval office?? :-) Michael