Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jimsy who wrote (26935)	1/24/1999 1:25:00 PM
From: Alan Whirlwind	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116871

"I think the above is the real threat, not Clintons hiding an embarrassing mutually agreed to sexual fondling with an intern who sought him out." Willey didn't seek out Bill's fondling. "They didn't even have sex for heavens sake." Yeah, Monica had sex and Clinton didn't. LOL "Hyde admitted to what appears to be sexual intercourse outside his m arriage, Livingston had several sexual intercourse escapades, and it appears that pro-life Barr signed the check for an abortion of his first wife while he was having an affair with his current wife." Fine with me if all the hypocrites are weeded out. But as far as I can see, there are 2 or 3 liberals making this category for every one conservative. "Simply Clinton is in tune with what the vast majority of the country wants..." Where do you come up with this tripe? Affirmative action and partial birth abortion to name a couple policies would be gone if the polls determined the issues directly. Sure, everyone who has a job might be satisfied right now in the US and they well should be--certainly better than being out on the street in Guatemala City. "...and the Republicans aren't, and they don't know how to organize to get in tune, ie no leadership. And actually this is quite unfortunate, because they could get wiped out in the next elections, the Democrats become dominant, then you don't have the correct balance to keep the the Democrats from becoming corrupt." Go Away. A liberal like you could care less if the conservatives here lost control of congress. Why don't you worry about your own crumbling currency and sorry bankrupt socialist government?

To: Jimsy who wrote (26935)	1/24/1999 4:30:00 PM
From: William Peavey	Respond to of 116871

Jimsy, you said, "You don't have the correct balance to keep the the Democrats from becoming corrupt." The Democrats are and have been corrupt, their choice in the executive branch is ample proof. Their blind, amoral defense of Charming Billy is continuing evidence of this self-serving corruption. "Simply Clinton is in tune with what the vast majority of the country wants." Americans are presently fat, dumb, and happy, and they do not want the Republican Party acting as their collective conscience. Unfortunately, they should be humiliated and embarrassed for having elected Clinton not only once but once gain, despite all his obvious shenanigans. Hey, surf's up Dude, don't rock my boat. . . "And if the best the Republicans can do is come forth with Dan Quayle as a candidate, they are indeed in deep disarray." Candidates can run on their own in this country. Quayle will serve a useful purpose in forcefully pointing out the obvious weaknesses and corruption in the Democrat's heir apparent, President Gore. My bet however, would lie with Liddy Dole or George Bush, Jr as I believe even Republicans don't want Candidate Dan to embarrass them again. We can all see that the Republicans have taken a huge political risk in jeopardizing the state of the union and the stock market with their dogged pursuit of Clintongate. I personally do not care a whit what the dumbed down American population says, polls be damned. Further, Jimsy, I do not care what our international neighbors say, no matter how much they have committed in our financial markets. Our nation was founded on a belief in God and ethical behavior, and every hundred years or so we have to be reminded why. Bill Peavey