To: aleta who wrote (277 ) 1/24/1999 3:00:00 PM From: PartyTime Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2003
8.6 for the non-invested versus 11.5 for the fully invested, is that right, Aleta? That's what your numbers tell us. I'm presuming, of course, you figured Jon's daily rate at the 2500 mark, instead of the lowball, 2000 mark, based on my estimated figure of 2000-3000 JT posts? Is that what you did? No matter how you look at it, your 8.6 figure is born out of the following reality: JT's been linked--by his own posting--to shorting; and you've been linked--by your own posting--to daytrading: Both of you taken together rarely--Tara never--own either Zulu or ESVS on a long basis. So this might explain the methodology, or the slant, behind your combined anti-Zulu/ESVS comments. So, Aleta, let's call it 8.0, instead of 8.6, for the non-invested. Unless, of course, you used the lowball figure for JT, in which care your numbers would be higher. On the other hand, 11.5 from someone fully invested is not unusal, particularly if the individual is capable of writing well enough, typing well enough and thinking well enough. I feel OK about my position. Seems to me like you and Jon, unless you have a precious motivation of some kind, are wasting am awful lot of time posting anti-Zulu propaganda on these threads. In fact, I directly blame the two of you for misleading me on Zulu's closing down the SIM operations in Europe. What do you think about that? The situation in Europe is a perfect example of how the two of you combined to weave a picture of Zulu that was not true. Frankly, I'm sick of it and would hope that some day you see the light in this matter or conclude you've accomplished your Zulu bashing agenda and move on to other areas.