Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (29603)	1/24/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Judge Holloway can rule however she wants. What's clear is that Starr wants to keep his inquisitional hooks in Lewinsky, lest she be tempted to stray from the Starr version of the "truth", carefully constructed by picking and choosing those parts of her testimony damaging to Clinton. If she varies from the line that Starr has chosen, I'm sure various legal parties will be there to remind her about the travails of Susan McDougal and Julie Steele, among others. That's the whole point of Starr's carefully crafted immunity agreement, if she changes any little bit of the story in a way that Starr doesn't like, it's back to the inquistional chambers for her. For all those expecting some breakthrough in the anti-Clinton movement via Lewinsky's testimony, I'd say the odds are against it. Nobody's treated her very well, but if she had to choose sides between Clinton and Starr. . . All the Clinton haters have bleated nonstop innuendo about those FBI files, but the Starr blackmail methods are transparently overt.