Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (7458)	1/24/1999 11:10:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 27311

Zeev, busted of Shorter Rule # 11. "Maintain an appearance of being open minded, but a slant in either direction is acceptable". That is all you do on this board. Act open minded toward VLNC, and then slip the knife in and twist. You seem to be trying real hard to "suggest" that VLNC is headed lower based on the Barron's article, seeing as you have felt it necessary to point this out in more than one post. "If it breaks lower.." You have no business here other than to hurt the value of VLNC shares by trying to scare investors into selling. You have "left" several times before, how about making it permanent this time? # 14 "Don't worry if people peg you as a slammer. The doubt will remain and that is what you are after" You've been pegged buddy, move on to the next company! I think Rule # 15 which covers your other suspected alteregos (i.e. BAT and LB) (go ahead and act shocked and protest) won't work either, so don't waste our time. Am I paranoid, maybe, but I have yet to hear any plausible explanation as to why you guys spend so much time on this board (with no vested interest) to save us from our investment. If you respond to this post, answer just this one question: Why do you spend so much time posting on this board? P.S. Visnic is also welcome to answer this question!

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (7458)	1/24/1999 11:20:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

If the price of VLNC falls tomorrow as it very well might given the less than positive account in an influential newspaper as Barron's, some of you might begin to wonder if some of the more "nimble" traders are again selling shares in hopes of buying them back from you later. You wouldn't be blamed for wondering if their sales are contributing to the falling price. Many of you have been quick to condemn Brubaker for allegedly doing that. Before you do it again, go back and recount the names who place themselves among the stalwart, emotional longs who have not denied as much.