Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : I Love to Fish -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AugustWest who wrote (238)	1/24/1999 11:46:00 PM
From: pezz	Respond to of 1413

<< Do you know how foolish you sound? I won't even touch on most of your last piece>> Perhaps to you I sound foolish.But this only shows your inability to understand concepts that don't suit your agenda.I can see why you won't touch most of my post you are not able to defend your position. <<Did I ever once say I wasted one single bit of the fish?>> You still don't get it do you. Whether or not you waste what you rape from the environment is not the point! If you drive a species into extinction it matters not whether you use it or flush it. <<So you're saying that it's okay for you to drive your car to and from work, or use your ski jet in the water, but it's not okay for me to kill a fish for dinner? >> Say what!! gee, I don't remember saying anything about driving a car or ski jet! Just about some one poaching spawning salmon ! <<And, just to give you a little clue as to how far off base you are, where I come from the creeks are shale based. That means no gravel. That means no eggs would hatch. Therefor, the spawn is in vain. The fish would die and the eggs would be eaten by lake run trout. End of story.>> I am not aware of this situation. Tell me is taking these spawning Salmon as you do legal? If not I don't buy your story that none of the spawn survives. If so then I stand corrected but I can see by your posts that you haven't a clue as to what respecting the environment is all about. <<Those teeming millions you speak of do not all live in cities. Figured it out yet? Or is there more?>> What an unbelievable bogus argument. Why would this possibly relevant? Are you saying they have no supermarkets where they live and some how will die if they show respect for nature? Or that they can save a buck by over fishing and hunting so that is justification enough? pez