Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (384)	1/25/1999 9:47:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2003

PartyTime, what Brady suggests... Brady says :<< I'm sure that if one were to call and say they were ready to drop $100,000.00 into the stock if they were informed about certain matters, they would get answers. Probably answers over dinner at a fancy restaurant.>> ... is blatently illegal, unless "certain matters" are insignificant matters. How is HPD being a 'basher" to point this out? If Brady is right, then the company is breaking the law. HPD is suggesting that they wouldn't do that, and that the company wouldn't give preferential treatment to large investors. It seems to me that HPD isn't bashing at all, but defending the company, saying that they wouldn't disobey the law the way that Brady suggests that they would. So, let's try this again - who's right? Brady, or HPD? Do you think that ZULU obeys the law, and releases significant information only through public sources, or do you think they bend the rules for a price?

To: PartyTime who wrote (384)	1/28/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: aleta	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2003

The same could be said about people who claim to be pro Zulu as well. Is there some sort of "orchestrated campaign" to pump up the price of this stock? Why not just stick to the issue of debating questions about this company rather then worry about why everyone is here. Answer the questions concerning those of us who might actually invest in this company and you'd have a better chance of seeing the value of your investment increase then by bashing those asking the questions. I will say this in all candor. I would very much like to believe this is a viable company and the news about Glassberg is good, but since the history of this company has seen good names come and go, it isn't something I, as a potential investor, would take to the bank long term, but it was certainly good for daytrading. The company has had the opportunity to answer questions that are of concern to just oridinary, everyday type investors, like me, and has failed to do so. What else should I do then daytrade this stock until it does answer those question which concern me? Make me a believer. Make me want to keep my money in long term. Answer the questions!!!