Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (29734)	1/25/1999 3:49:00 PM
From: Sedohr Nod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

i suspect you frighten to easily.....

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (29734)	1/25/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

<<And do you agree that Clinton is that (some sort of guard to protect women's independence)?>> I have come to see that he is perceived as that. So, whether he does guard anything or not, I agree that the perception of him in that position is what is important to his supporters. I would like to see that be the focus of some public dialog instead of the pretense of a Senate trial on criminal charges.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (29734)	1/27/1999 8:40:00 AM
From: Sedohr Nod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, i was just getting in from my very productive and useful midnight basketball class....when i heard on wls radio about 23 sex offenders getting an early release......then i remembered your "rational" fear of Ralph Reed and Dan Quayle....... i hope one or more of those sex offenders don't move next door to you or me.....but they are going to be a "neighbor" to some one ......now that is something to worry about and probably fear....... Michelle you should worry more about who is appointing liberal federal judges......i doubt these gentle people would have been released if the judges knew they would show up in their neighborhoods.... don