Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (27015)	1/25/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: Baba 2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116762

micap, then they should NEVER have found themselves in that position....I dont get bailed out when I lose...do you????....So I guess the moral of the story to the big guys is don't worry about the size of your bet...go ahead make your billions..if your wrong we'll cover your ass...Come on MICAP...I'm not buying that crap...

To: RMF who wrote (27015)	1/25/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116762

<<If you ran the FED would you have done differently?>> I would not have done it in such a way that those that had to be saved were awarded a bonus!!!!!!!! It is becoming clear the manipulation of the gold market ran well before the begining of the LTCM problem & continues to this very day!! To Steal money from the long term holders of mining stocks & give it to LTCM was WRONG! The federal reserve is not allowed under the Constitution the power of taxation. There was always the possibility of a broad based tax or fee on ALL tax payers, not just the mining interests. This would require an act of Congress and it was not to happen.