Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Judith who wrote (8450)	1/25/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: SalmonMan	Respond to of 40688

Thanks, Judith. Finally some rationality. The PR was a confirming indication that PNLK is serious about the future. I'm just trying to take it at face value, nothing more, nothing less. This is a long battle, folks. Anyone claiming victory hasn't followed PNLK (or many other BBs, for that matter) for very long.

To: Judith who wrote (8450)	1/25/1999 10:53:00 PM
From: ztect	Respond to of 40688

Judith, intelligent post... I have no problem with momentum traders or even shorters for that matter.All part of the game. What I do have problems with are those that omit pertinent information so as to dissuade others from making an investment for the self serving purpose of their position. This excerpt from your post is the crux of my argument "....Maybe they got a better price, maybe not. Maybe AT&T has an interest in the final product, maybe not. We don't have the answers to that...." Neither CP, yourself or I have "the answers". Any conclusions are irresponsible, because if the answers to the above ARE better rates for services than RATES can be gotten for the same services elsewhere, that in and of itself is another reason to use PNL's web services and products. That is my point....unlike CP, I see no need to make a not so subtle inference about PNL's integrity based on an apparently biased and invested point of view. Sincerely, ztect