Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Wind River going up, up, up! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Karpel who wrote (4113)	1/25/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: David M. Sawyer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10309

I'm also interested in hearing from some of the other individuals who have posted to this thread in the past, like Michael Greene and Dave Lehenky. I'm curious whether they are as upset as I am by the recent turn of events. If you remember earlier posts, Dave Lehenky made his final farewells prior to start of his employment with Wind River Systems

To: Richard Karpel who wrote (4113)	1/26/1999 1:09:00 AM
From: F. Foos	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10309

Richard Karpel, You have very little confidence in Wind River for someone who has held shares in it for the past 3 years. I would have expected that you would understand the business and your investment. It should be no surprise to you that the stock can actually go down in price. There have been at least 3 major sell-offs since you started investing in WIND. The stock recovered after each sell-off. There is no reason to expect that this time will be any different. I hope that you made a profit on the shares that you sold today. You may have left a lot of money on the table by selling so soon after the sell-off. Did you know that only 400K shares trading in 15 minutes from 1:05 to 1:20PM on Friday caused the share price to drop from $47 to $30? The trading support since then has been very strong. The market has been able to absorb all of the shares that stampeding sellers could deliver, without further price deterioration. Since 1:30 Friday, the share price has risen nearly $5.00 on about 13 million shares traded. This trading volume represents more than an average month's worth in little more than one day. What does this tell you? It means that there is considerable demand for the shares. When the panic dissipates, it is probable that the recovery can continue. I think that you are spending too much time trying to fix blame on others and not enough time looking at your own investment style. I gather from what you have told me, that your investment in WIND was far in excess of your comfort zone. You need to make investments that you can live with; not ones that are going to cause you anxiety and give you ulcers. If you don't understand the basket, don't put so may eggs in it. Understanding is strictly a do-it-yourself project. You have to do the spade work. Nobody can do it for you. You may occasionally get lucky but, until you come to terms with this, you will be stuck time and time again. I agree that Allen Benn needs no defense against your baseless accusations. My intention was to point out to you why I disagree with your methodology and your views. Now quit your bitchin' and go make some money. Frank

To: Richard Karpel who wrote (4113)	1/26/1999 1:41:00 PM
From: Ronald Paul	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10309

I doubt whether Mr. Kraber's head is going to roll over this one. The characterization that his talk to analysts on Friday was a pre-earnings warning is probably an apt one. WIND has, and continues to manage the business with a sober realism that is preciously rare in the high-flying hi-tech world. WIND has consistently beaten the consensus by 1 to 2 cents for 20 consecutive quarters. Under these circumstances, if and when WIND received indications that a quarter may not deliver to these expectations, they are faced with a binary choice - pre-announce, or don't pre-announce; in the face of extremely high expectations. It would be unbelievably out of character, thus improbable IMO, that Mr. Kraber acted in a vacuum here. It was a tough call and time will tell if it was the right one. I could think of a couple of reasons for the hickup. One obvious one; I2O. Now that the chips are down, there is widespread consensus that it is a technology that will not have a long 1/2-life. On the upside, I2O is providing WIND with material profit $$$s, just not nearly as much as many followers were anticipating. To WIND's credit, and within character, they have consistently provided very conservative, open guidance regarding the prospects of I2O since its inception. Another event that coincides with this quarter is the extra attention and focus needed by managment for the move to the new location of their offices. Although the longterm benefits of the move are obvious, their is a real shortterm impact that is hard to quantify until the quarterly numbers start trickling in. Other looming developments come via MSFT, INTS, and LINUX among others. It stands to reason that WIND should expect more choppy waters ahead given the announcements and history of the last two years that INTS may finally be digging itself out and that MSFT may soon unveil something more credible than realtime CE, or INTS-in-a-MSFT-NT-box. The real question for the longterm investor is, "does MSFT present a realistic threat to WIND's future?" The big question is hard to answer. Until MSFT makes up for the credibility gap it suffers from in this industry, in the meantime WIND will enjoy crucial time in fortifying its hills. I have been in the embedded systems industry for over 11 years. I'm intimate with COTS RTOS's and have had the pleasure of writing my own. I am not in a position to discuss the technical merits of each competitor in this forum, but feel the need to mention this in order to lend a degree of support to why I have put my $$$ behind WIND shortly after their IPO. There is no doubt that MSFT will again rattle their saber, or that some WIND customer may choose a competitor for various reasons from time to time. This type of news will certainly rattle the stock price. But, WIND has a critical head start with superior products wrapped in a winning business model in an growing industry segment with a high entry cost. I keep my ear to the ground, but it gives me real peace of mind that WIND continues to successfully demonstrate that they are forging ahead with their growth strategy and so far see nothing in the most recent events that cause me to divest and sit on the sidelines. Cheers, Ronald Paul