SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (440)1/26/1999 5:00:00 AM
From: wlcnyc  Respond to of 2003
 
"...And my gut sense of logic tells me JT does indeed have a fourth reason for his presence here. What do you think?"

I can only surmise that none of the reasons previously cited by Mr. Tara could reasonably explain his "obsessive" behavior in regards to Zulu. Therefore, I assume that he has yet to disclose the #1 reason for his behavior. Perhaps his reference to the "White Horse Tavern" is his subtle way of providing clues to his behavior (maybe he has tired of being the mystery man).

As to his question -

"If I drop $100K on ZULU, can I get dinner here?"

I say, "Go for it Jon!" I am sure he "can" get dinner there whether or not in invests in Zulu. However I suspect that he meant will dinner be provided for him. Whether or not his dinner is "provided" as a result of his investment is rather unimportant to me. I do believe that he has enough common sense to NOT bash his own investment. So if he tries this approach, we will all be winners - he will get an answer to his pressing question, if not dinner, and we will all benefit by not having to address his constant negativity. In the best of all cases, he will get dinner AND become pro-Zulu - can you imagine that!?

Seems like an expensive way for him to get an answer and dinner, but it appears that "time/money" is not a problem for him. Watch closely today to see if his buy goes through....

Bill



To: PartyTime who wrote (440)1/26/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Jon Tara  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2003
 
PT, you left out the "alegedly". Please be careful in the future.

Your statement regarding the value of the time I have expended here is false and libelous, and I demand a retraction.