To: Paul Schmidt who wrote (5118 ) 1/26/1999 6:49:00 PM From: Marty Lee Respond to of 11417
Hail Nathan! Sorry Paul, I can't help myself! Dear Nathan, Again, who are the anal-ysts you've confided in? You've appealed arguementum ad verecundiam (appeal to “authority”) to outside sources in order give your "devil's advocate" position the sound of some veracity. Names please! Don't leave these poor bastards in the closet! Bring ‘em out here! So I can shoot 'em one by one! The question with WAVX is not a big IF. It's simply a matter of WHEN. And that begins THIS YEAR. The chips are being ready-made by SMSC and will roll out on tuner boards from HAUP to begin with, followed shortly by EMBASSY and HP. The technologies for security, multi-channel content distribution, transaction's processing, and actual independent desktop publishing for business to business and consumer e-commerce (verified by HP, RSA, NEC, SMSC, HAUP, WAVO, IBM, SUNW, and recently INTC, … the list goes on. <g>) which WAVX represents are rapidly approaching. A whole, new world of wonderful capabilities, conveniences, and e-commerce economic activities will be an inevitable part of the portending evolution and convergence in communications through digitalization. SOMEBODY'S GOING TO DO IT! And WAVX has no peer providing the necessary architectural solutions FOR EVERYBODY to do it. So WHY NOT WAVX? Bad management? Not on your life! Financially under the gun? Nope. WAVX has plenty of well heeled resources to fund its ongoing business objectives. So where's the beef, you say? Well, Nathan, it's in the kitchen being cooked to your specifications. If you had some WAVX stock, you could have gone back stage and cut off a nice chunk today along with the other daytraders! Sincerely, Marty