Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: david sosiak who wrote (27056)	1/26/1999 10:44:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Hey David..... Bite me!!! My wife and I lost approx 5 K on this stock because their PR firm and management can't seem to get its collective act together and find some coverage on the street that will get this stock over $10/share. I wish I HAD been short... then I would have been UP 5 K instead. I call 'em like I see 'em David, right or wrong. If you don't like it, tough... Ron

To: david sosiak who wrote (27056)	1/26/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

And I had to just a add a few more points about TAVA management.... They have no concept of building shareholder equity in this market. They all of a sudden pop up with a news release as a reaction to their stock breaking down. WHAT THE HLL PREVENTED THEM FROM RELEASING THIS WHEN THEY HAD MOMENTUM ON THEIR SIDE!!!!!! I really want to know...:0( Think about that perspective a bit, David before you start lamblasting my analysis. This is a stock "market". To sell stock (or anything else), you must have a "marketing" plan. And reacting to someone slamming your stock with a press release is not "marketing". It's an act of desperation. And it smacks of weakness on the part of management psychology and PR. These guys have a great story to tell, and their not telling it, and that psses me off. Btw, the only reason we made money in TAVA last spring was because I was conservative enough to sell our position before we went on vacation. It was substantially cheaper when we came back. Regards, Ron

To: david sosiak who wrote (27056)	1/26/1999 12:00:00 PM
From: fma	Respond to of 31646

David - add me to the growing list of posters who wish you'd listen a little more, and post a little less. Your short conspiracy theories derogate your credibility among those longs who have been here for the long haul. Over the past two years we've gotten to know each other pretty well, ... but we don't know you. We've seen the best of hypsters and the worst of shorts, and your a long way from falling in either group. If you want to be accecpted, give it a rest. fma