Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenya AA who wrote (45210)	1/26/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: Labrador	Respond to of 97611

Answer me -- do current CPQ s/hs get any altavista stock in the spin? thanks

To: Kenya AA who wrote (45210)	1/26/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: Elwood P. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Kenya or anyone... WILL CPQ spin-off any shares to shareholders??? If so, what is the plan??? El

To: Kenya AA who wrote (45210)	1/26/1999 11:04:00 AM
From: Sueponine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Kenya, I've been busy all morning and have only caught pieces of this news. Am I misunderstanding? They are calling this an IPO which tells me (CPQ shareholder) that I don't get any AV shares. Have they made any statements about spinning off any shares to CPQ shareholders? Thanks. Sueponine.

To: Kenya AA who wrote (45210)	1/26/1999 11:21:00 AM
From: Obewon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

Compaq spins off AV to shareholders finally responding to changing market fundamentals. Compaq realizes that AV is no longer a top tier Internet site and needs content. To get the content it can: 1) develop it (not practical in today's hyperspeed races) 2) buy it (would cost too much at today's Internet prices) 3) deal for it (very possible but might complicate other corporate strategies) Now, # 1 is not practical and #3 diverts attention away from a core business that actually currently makes money. As for #2, CPQ is a >$50 billion dolar company so people assume that it could easily purchase content even at these prices. However, conspicuously unmentioned is the fact that most of the rich Internet valuations are being based on the value of the stocks that are involved in the deal. For example @Home paid a huge amount IN STOCK for all of Excite. Now I may be a bit out of the mainstream but @Home is a money-losing, cash flow negative, and overvalued company. It uses its stock (which is basically worthless on a fundamental basis) to buy an Internet company (which is also has very little fundamental value apart from a brand name). Getting back to the point at hand. CPQ spins off AV which pleases shareholders and lets management deveote their attention to selling computers and designing new products. AV gets awarded a huge multiple that allows its (nearly worthless) stock to be used to buy other (nearly useless) Internet companies to get the content they need. The only ones who get hurt are the people left standing sometime in the future when the music stops, and no one right now cares about them. Sounds like a WIN/WIN situation to me. ;) OB