SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neal davidson who wrote (17558)1/26/1999 11:37:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Neal, you make very important points about all of these desert dirt companies. After Bre-X and DELGF people would only accept COC. Since then we have seen screw ups at IPM, Naxof, and Maxam even with COC. What proof will be accepted? I think that all these companies need to give a mineralization theory followed with reproducible assays for a reasonable portion of their property. Just like people knowing pornography when they see it, investors will know when proof is available IMO.



To: Neal davidson who wrote (17558)1/26/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 20681
 
I vote for the gold bar. Especially one with my name on it! JLA



To: Neal davidson who wrote (17558)1/26/1999 12:53:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Respond to of 20681
 
Neal,

A reputable lab confirming extensive testing on chain of custody material with two or three check labs confirming it. Or a production assay with the same degree of verification.

Henry


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News