SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (29956)1/26/1999 1:12:00 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 67261
 
Talk about trying to hard and losing credibility? Did you read that one over before you posted it? hahahahaha JLA



To: TigerPaw who wrote (29956)1/26/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
So they can go on this witness thing block by block? I mean, even though the present witness list has just 3 people, the next batch of witnesses may consist of 5 or 6 additional witnesses derived from the testimony of the first batch? Is that how it works? (I hope there will be more and more and even more witnesses down the road. That is the only sure way to drag this one for months...)






To: TigerPaw who wrote (29956)1/26/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 67261
 
<<It's easier to just get Ken Starr to drag them into a hotel and beat the requested answers out of them.>>

I don't know this to be true of Ken Starr. I have serious doubts that he has done anything wrong, but I'm open to listening to anyone who thinks they can prove it. On the other hand, I have proof that bill clinton is a remorseless liar and cheat; and that his devoted followers really don't care.