SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (47422)1/26/1999 4:24:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573646
 
<Dixon could move to .18u/desktop but the real problem is that this chip is faster clock for clock than the Pentium III.>

No problem. First of all, I think Coppermine, the 0.18 micron desktop version of the Pentium III, will have 256K of on-die cache, but don't quote me on that. Second, if there are two versions of the Pentium III at the same speed, one with on-die cache, and the other with off-chip cache, Intel will just resort to the 'PE' designation to differentiate between the two. Remember that the Dixon is now sold at 266PE, 300PE, 333, and 366. The 266PE and 300PE monikers are supposed to differentiate Dixon from the 266 and 300 MHz mobile Deschutes. It's the Celeron 300 vs. 300A scenario all over again.

Tenchusatsu



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (47422)1/26/1999 6:37:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573646
 
Jim, all, I estimate size of Dixon even bigger, as large as 184 mm^2. I believe the Deshutes die was shrunk from 130 to 120 (saw this someplace), so the 128K cache on the Celeron takes 154-120=34 mm^2. Add another 30 to double the cache size (control circuitry doesn't double) and you get 184.

I also remember AMD claiming that the k6-3 was for the notebook market, but the two samples we've seen were in socket 7 packaging (Anandtech and Thresh firingsquad). Also, there was a somewhat ambiguaous statement in the CC about a 2nd quarter release of the notebook K6-3.

Although its not on their official roadmap, if Intel manages to get decent percentage yields on the big Dixon chip, and AMD is threatening their Pentium III/Pentium II market with the K6-3, they will make a desktop version.

Petz



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (47422)1/27/1999 12:16:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1573646
 
Jimbo - Re: " If AMD can't get decent yields on the K6-3 (w/256k) it had better move up the release of the K7. "

Good logic, Jimmy.

If the yields on the 117 sq. mm. K6-3 are low, then switching to a 184 sq. mm. K7 will definitely IMPROVE the YIELDS !

Uh huh !

Paul