SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (479)1/26/1999 5:07:00 PM
From: kemosabe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2003
 
yes, very familiar:

"... readies itself for expansion and acquisition, it's adding new high-salary staff members with specialties in sponsorship sales."

hmmmmm



To: PartyTime who wrote (479)1/26/1999 5:23:00 PM
From: Jon Tara  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2003
 
There's a difference between 24/7 and ZULU/ESVS, though.

They are selling shares at FULL price, with a public stock offering.

ESVS sold their last shares at a 50% discount to the market, in a private offering.

The Investor Preferred converts into 10 million shares of ESVS stock, and converts when the acquisition deal closes.

That's almost twice as many shares as ZULU shareholders will wind-up with.

And what did the "investors" in the Investor's Preferred pay? The equivalent (post-split) of 50 cents a share, at a time when the stock was selling for the equivalent of $1.00 share.

TFSM choose to respect their shareholders, by offering new shares at the market price. (This also brings in more cash to the company than with ESVS's scheme.) ESVS, on the other hand, has shown their contempt for current shareholders, by privatly selling shares at 1/2 price. One has to wonder whose interests the board is really looking after.

I would be equally critical of TFSM if they were selling new shares at $18.50/share, while their shares trade at $37. But they aren't, which is why you can't compare TFSM's apples with ESVS's crabapples.



To: PartyTime who wrote (479)1/27/1999 12:01:00 AM
From: Fredman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2003
 
what about the past acquisitions, and the 'top-notch management' they had but is no longer there (for whatever reasons.....) ??? the history of revolving-door upper management speaks for itself. V-P's just don't come and go like short-order cooks at burger king, IF there is anything to the company (future $$$$$) at all, why on earth would you leave ???.