Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30012)	1/26/1999 5:51:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<I'll say you skimmed it, brees, your reading comprehension seems quite limited here, to paraphrase JLA. Where did you get the "primarily a group of influential Democrats" out of that one? >> Yep, I skimmed it and here is the heading from your article where I got it: "Law Firm Included Influential Democrats" Dan, I have not looked into whys and wherefores of the case being built against bc with regards to the righteousness, or lack there of, of his enemies. I've never argued what the other side is made up of. In fact, I have mentioned on several occassions that the partisan BS of this whole episode in our history is sickening to me and in light of that I have no aliance with either "side." Or with individuals on either side. As far as the players go. Larry Flynt is nobody to me, I don't like him but I don't really have an issue on what he stands for beyond that. I know for sure bc is lying and that he stands in a position to represent me and my nation. I don't support him for that reason alone and I have no sympathy for him.