SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DD™ who wrote (30035)1/26/1999 5:54:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Yoo hoo! Come back after exactly one month, will ya? i.e. Feb 26, 1999. Let's see who wins in the "logic and common sense" department -- you or me!



To: DD™ who wrote (30035)1/26/1999 6:00:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
If it is so advantageous for the Dems to drag this thing out, as you theorize, then why aren't Clinton's attorneys making the same argument as you, i.e., "bring on the witnesses".


DUH! Because they have already won their case thats why! There is absolutely no advantage to the Dems to call witnesses. It probably wont hurt them either but there is nothing to be gained.

Unlike the republicans, the dems also have the decency not to waste any more time on this charade and damage any more lives.