Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (13361)	1/26/1999 7:34:00 PM
From: Rick the Vet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

You clowns break me up. What's the matter salty didn't they invite you to speak at the convention. Please read the release before you yap. The largest diamonds from the CF of Pit 1 and Pit 2 were indeed 0.234, 0.208 and 0.130. The largest diamonds from the cores however were 0.747, 0.691 and 0.469 carats. When is the last time we saw 3/4 carat stones come out of core wise guy. Yeah I know, they must have salted them --- You are an idiot. Go ahead sell tomorrow you putz-- Make my day. To all the rest of you Putz's. I hope you all sell tomorrow. Just me, Red, and TeeVee will be left to count our millions in 8 months.

To: E. Charters who wrote (13361)	1/26/1999 9:24:00 PM
From: Cohiba	Respond to of 26850

Dear Eric, If Macros are those that are > 0.50mm how can you state that there are only 44 macros. That is the number of diamonds that did not pass the 1.18mm X 1.18 mm sreen. That is a bit large for 0.50mm diamonds don't you think? If you are honest, you will state on this thread that there is no way from that release that you can tell how many macros they have in the samples. You do not mention one of the most important statement in this release which is that the Normalized diamond abundance of Pit 2, the NW dyke, the North shore, the down dip of the NW dyke and the SE drills are relatively uniform. I remind you that the grade from Pit 2 is 1.47 ct/t which is higher that the 1.14 ct/t reported for Pit 1 and Pit 2 together. In other words, eventhough the samples are too small to statistically predict the grade, those results seem to confirm the homogeneity of of the deposit and clearly imply that the grade may well be much higher than 1.14 ct/t. Regards, Cohiba