Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30095)	1/26/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: Marty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Thanks for your quote on the moral choices before us and a much better explanation than I could make of the reasons Starr and the rest of the right wing Republicans have been so overwhelmingly rejected. I am amazed on another level at the depth of their hatred and how it has even clouded the judgement of their leaders in a way that has enabled their most zealous members, in effect, determine the future of their party.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30095)	1/26/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: miraje	Respond to of 67261

Dan, may or may not care what happens to Clinton, but I'd guess he agrees somewhat with the above sentiments. I think you know that Clintons political fate doesn't much arouse my emotions, one way or the other. The revulsion I feel towards those who initiate sexual inquisitions, however, does fire my motor. BTW, I do appreciate your kind words. Now if only I could get you to see the light on anti-trust and laissez-faire economic policies.... LOL! :-) Regards, JB

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (30095)	1/27/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<What most people don't care about, I'd guess, is a bunch of moral reformationists and political hygienists handicapped by a lot of heavy timber in the eye. In a two party system, our choices are limited.>> On the one hand, yeah. But, the problem I see with this take is that you put the force of the law in the hands of Starr, Hyde etc. on one side and the pettiness of bc having a fling on the other. You paint these politicians as totally bent out of shape in their extreme and unwarranted personal vendetta, using the full force of the government against poor bill and his liaison with Monica. I don't. There is plenty of extremism out there on all sides, no doubt. But, the team line up, looks more like hustler flynt and hush money Huddle etc. on the one side; Starr and Hyde etc on the other side. I have heard the personal character questions raised about all of these people. Its not the Broncos against Central High as you typically paint the picture.