Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: .Trev who wrote (13389)	1/26/1999 11:44:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

My qualifications are that I am a diamond explorationist and I know considerably more about how to find diamonds than the Winspear staff. If they start to study night and day they will take more than 5 years to catch up to me. My qualifications are that I know what the releases mean here as to whether or not WSP ever becomes a mine and I don't think there are too many who post here who have the foggiest. I don't even argue with a geo on exploration unless he has his PHD and/or 20 years in the field. And then I will tell him what's what and with few exceptions. I have heard too many of them. All book and no application knowledge. And some of the explorationists could use a few years of book too. Bad attitude? I guess. So what. At least I can add up the reports without asking questions. The big problem with these excahnge reports is they are designed to sell stock. They leave out anything that would tell an informed investor what the chances are. What they leave out and won't or cannot answer is more instructive than what they tell you. What about the value of the larger stones? Nary a word. It's a "micro diamond correlative report". What unadulterated tripe. The Canadian diamond explorationist doesn't have a clue on the average. But hey, that leaves a lot our there to find. EC<:-}