SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (2461)1/26/1999 11:55:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh  Respond to of 5143
 
And that says it all...I truly wish I had your grasp of the concise...rather than otherwise...here is my otherwise..ie not concise but still in my twisted minds; eye ..seeing 2thepoint!RE:
techstocks.com
Chuca
P.S.- Congrats MGAU...I have to say ...I like the old name best now...ever think of CHANGING... IT..(the old name) back...folks like me, just might twist the intent of the new name- HAUL ASS -MIKE. I know you can take it...it takes a smart @#$ ...to know a Haul ASS! Keep on truckin and retain value for the investors....that appears to be Job #2. ( One is gold...yeahp!) GOLD. Natural GOLD Company next? The words lead fire assay should be in emphasis.( but...that is JMO, but i may know!) Old name...I don't mean GUILD MARK...but that was appro..gold leaf. That is the ticket GOLD LEAF. Psst...don't leaf the gold there...it ain't any leverite there! So, they used to call Mike ...Mika ( Mica ) Mike- everything he saw was gold...and not a nugget found...untul now. ( It is allright - that was the Mike Joke of 1997- now in 1999 ...Gold Mike strikes again and again - he was a baseball reporter and this ain't a fowl ball situation but half a aounce is nice to have- what would be better...striking...silver...with other rare earth elements as Maxam used to key into?)



To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (2461)1/27/1999 6:35:00 AM
From: JKNF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5143
 
Thanks for the clarificarion Richard. If they are getting assays this great, then there is no reason to expect the bulk sample to be any less. Right

Thanks and Regards

John