Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MGV who wrote (7616)	1/27/1999 12:49:00 AM
From: FMK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

DG, Here's an old post from Yahoo that seems written for you! by: Chuzzelwit 7427 of 8677 semi pro- I feel a little stupid talking to a box of rocks but the quality of the naysayers posts, like your own and Althrow's, has gone downhill. It appears the smart shorts have already covered and we therefore don't hear from them anymore. It's dumb to short Valence and dumb not to have covered already. If you shorted at 7 and it goes to 20 you have a 13 dollar loss. Ouch! No matter how hard you try its not likely you can worry many shareholders enough to sell you their stock. Better just cover before it really gets away from you.

To: MGV who wrote (7616)	1/27/1999 1:39:00 AM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

"Vlnc is up 2% since 6/29/98. That is underperformance by almost 27% with the Nasdaq..." MIKL is DOWN 26%, and that's underperformance by 53%. This was your big pick of the last 2 1/2 years during the greatest bull market in history. Better get out that dart board for yourself or try the lottery.

To: MGV who wrote (7616)	1/27/1999 2:23:00 PM
From: Bob Childers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

DG - you are letting this whole discussion go to your head - please try to get a grip! Sure, FMK and some others are wild optimists on VLNC, but to pick a (low) day/period to complain about the "performance" of a stock as volatile as VLNC is less than meaningless. Lots of us have made LOTS of money w VLNC this year, and the bulls (including me) look forward to what we hope and believe will be a very tity profit this next year as the li-poly market takes off. You do us all a favor to present well reasoned arguments to be cautious. This stock is risky, but that is exactly why the upside is so appealing - and why we are invested here. FMK and others have summarized repeatedly the substantial reasons to be invested in VLNC, and I still like the odds - alot. That doesn't mean we bulls are unconscious of the legit observations of the bears here, but on balance we still expect to do well. So come on DG, lighten up - your posts the last couple days are slipping towards the shrill. Most of us are (semi)adults - lets leave the sandbox fights and name-calling off this thread PLEASE. Best of investing to all =- Bob