SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorrie coey who wrote (30145)1/27/1999 8:45:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
You really have missed this gentleman's point. He was responding to a scenario I had submitted, the principle of which came from Michelle. No man in his right mind would marry a rich sexless dog over a lovely woman.



To: lorrie coey who wrote (30145)1/27/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: miraje  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
Ms. coey,

The British have a saying that I would like to pass on to you as a piece of advice, "Don't get your knickers in a twist."

I really do feel sorry for you. Your sexist rantings (and they really are) reveal a severely insecure and disturbed personality. Does your selective use of CAPS in identifying gender, ie. men and Women, give you a sense of empowerment?

It's obvious that you will never know the joys of bonding with a mate of the opposite sex. It's also obvious that you have little knowledge of what motivates most men and women in their normal romantic interactions.

I've watched certain guys on this thread try to flirt with you. I find it as amusing as you do. Their mental fantasy picture of you is probably far removed from reality. Your posts conjure up, for me, an image of Andrea Dworkin, a most thoroughly repulsive female in every way.

You profess not to be a feminist. Dworkin must not be either, as the following link would suggest. She's right in tune with the RR about Clinton:

igc.apc.org



To: lorrie coey who wrote (30145)1/27/1999 2:59:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
I was going to write the same exact thing but you did it for me.

Gentlemen, if we are going to have anymore discussions on this topic of wealth vs. beauty (Im tired of it btw so you wont get any more from me) I want you to think of Maria Bartiromo as your candidate for the "wealth" side. Shes 37 I think and represents a sort of ideal as far as Im concerned.

Michelle