Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Neomagic Corp. (NMGC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vincenzo who wrote (2383)	1/27/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: Gauguin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3645

Morgan Stanley analyst is RECOMMENDING NeoMagic in today's Washington Post. Which is it? In the article, NeoMagic is said to be trading at unprecedented lows; and at a cheap price relative to the market "for the best." It is one of four listed stocks to make Morgan Stanley analyst Howard Penney's "Focus List." Are we supposed to believe one part of Morgan Stanley is downgrading while another is recommending? That they're just incompetent, not motivated? washingtonpost.com

To: vincenzo who wrote (2383)	1/27/1999 11:46:00 AM
From: A. Wayne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3645

Vincenzo, Games by the big players are the norm You're right if course. The big question is how far down does it go? When for us nimble small investors to pick up dirt cheap stock? Any ideas how far down the big boys will push it? Wayne

To: vincenzo who wrote (2383)	3/2/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: CMon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3645

<< CMon - If you are confused about what's going on here, you really shouldn't be investing in the stock market. Games by the big players are the norm, particularly in the smaller more volatile stocks. It stuns me that there are investors out there who don't understand this. They shouldn't be playing in this field. vincenzo>> So Vincenzo, a little time has passed. It seems that if your original thesis was anywhere close to the mark, the "Morgan Stanley conspiracy" would have run it's course and the stock would have run back to it's old highs. Since the evidence would seem not to support your theory, would you care to revisit the issue? Perhaps there's another explanation. I'm sure I'll be entertained by your self examination.