Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (579)	1/27/1999 11:23:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 2003

I happen to like Noam Chomskey. I wish more people in America were aware of him. But ABC would never include him on the Sunday Morning bunch. So it goes! Here's some guidelines for your "transitional marker" mystery. I suppose, instead of Chomskey, you could try William Strunk: columbia.edu As I understand it--and I'm using a memory going back 30 years or so--a transitional marker is something (can be a phrase or a word) like as follows: Therefore, I feel... "Therefore" would be a transitional marker. Or try this one: "In view of the foregoing..." "In view of the foregoing" would be a transitional marker. Now, go back and read my original phrase, and you will find, albeit a long transitional marker. I suppose transitional markers, transitories or participial phrases--whatever are better described by--well, maybe we do need Chomeskey! (LOL)