Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ZuluGroup.com (ZULU/ESVS)-Ecommerce & Internet Advertising -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bagladdy who wrote (595)	1/27/1999 11:54:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2003

Who knows, if more people click, maybe he'll get sick of all the disrespect he's put upon himself. You'd think it would eventually add up psychologically. I'm just sorry that I've been the one whose had the time and the kind of job in my life such that I've debated him. It's futile 'cause he doesn't care about us. All he cares about is destroying Zulu. It's historically in the record and it is exemplarfied by his current behavior. I believe it was FlatTaxMan, a long time ago, who said that if JT devoted the efforts he expends painting Zulu in a bad light toward world peace, we'd have a better world. Indeed, his writing is one of the worst examples I've ever encountered, in my whole life, of wasted energy. I'm sorry I've devoted my own time in responding to his garbage. But I guess there's nothing we can do about it.

To: Bagladdy who wrote (595)	1/27/1999 12:22:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2003

You didn't try to engage me in a conversation, Charles. You asked a series of personal questions, demanding that I answer them. In the process, you questioned my reasons for being here, making suggestions (incorrect) as to why that might be. I consider this a personal attack. Those same questions have been asked umpteen times by PartyTime. And, graciously, I answered them, although I had no obligation to do so. PartyTime didn't accept my answers, and so he has re-asked those same questions again and again and again, repeating the same (incorrect) insinuations. In effect, you called me a so-and-so, and I called you a so-and-so back. What I don't understand is your taking umbrage for being called a so-and-so back. It's not logical.