Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Shiva -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark A. Forte who wrote (4924)	1/28/1999 11:51:00 AM
From: bob zagorin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5036

what is the date for the vote? i haven't got a proxy because all i have is calls at this point. btw, my options went up to the full value today ($5 call traded at $1).

To: Mark A. Forte who wrote (4924)	1/30/1999 2:58:00 PM
From: Bruce Wilhite	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5036

All my NO! votes are cast!!!!

To: Mark A. Forte who wrote (4924)	2/4/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: Teddy Harton	Respond to of 5036

Read thru the proxy with much wonder as to how lawyers/investment bankers would paint this as a good deal for shiva shareholders. Also got a phone call tonite asking if I had received and responded. For those in law suit Mark Forte and others here is how Intel got Zucco to sell out. "Mr Zucco will be engaged as a consultant for 3 months for a monthly consulting fee of $100,000.00. Now, wouldn't it be ironic if Intel asks Zucco to stay on longer than 3 months that the agreement calls for. What if it turns out to be 12 months and Zucco pockets a extra $900,000.00 or close to a million for selling out Shiva shareholders. So nothing in writing here so I guess perfectly legal. THIS SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO HAPPEN!!!!!!!! Those in lawsuit see what legally can be written to avoid this "loophole" or possible windfall for Zucco as they pull wool over eyes of sucker Shiva shareholders.