SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (30425)1/27/1999 10:53:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
You guys better watch you language. The rules here are sort of funny about that.



To: DMaA who wrote (30425)1/27/1999 10:57:00 PM
From: Big D  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
DMA, you're absolutely right. The hypocrites in this whole business are the Democrats. At the beginning publicly and privately since, they condemned El Clinto's actions, a few called for his resignation.

Then, like lemmings to the sea, the few who knew in their hearts and minds that this is unacceptable conduct and that he committed perjury and obstruction, cowardly reversed themselves to save party and not face the displeasure of a society gone overboard on self indulgence and moral decay.

The final effects of all of this will not be felt or quantified for maybe ten years or so. However, there will be a price that will be paid for letting him take a walk. This demeaning of the Office Of The President has undermined whatever trust or respect that remained in the eyes of the citizens for that position. The requirements and qualifications for that position are now dumbed down the the less than ordinary. In fact, a high school principal's job requirements are far above The Office of The President.

The message going forward is simply this, "give us the known corrupted person, unmoral person, perjurious person, lying person, phony person, cowardly person; we don't care as long as he tells us what we want to hear and bribes us by throwing money promises at every disaffected and malcontent group. Take the money and run, but don't ask why or how.



To: DMaA who wrote (30425)1/27/1999 11:21:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 67261
 
Rep. Robert Wexlar (D.-Fla.)- "The President did not tell the truth. He lied under oath. That's some-thing we have to deal with.... His actions are indefensible."
VOTED NOT GUILTY

Rep. Rick Boucher (D.-Va.)- "That statement was made under oath. I personally don't think it was truthful:"
VOTED NOT GUILTY

Sen. Charles Schumer (D.-NY), - "To me it is clear the President lied when he testified before the grand jury:"
VOTED NOT GUILTY



To: DMaA who wrote (30425)1/28/1999 6:30:00 AM
From: jimpit  Respond to of 67261
 
That's the idea!

There must be HUNDREDS of clips and combinations out there!

jim