Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (30451)	1/28/1999 10:36:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

New ideas? The man bashing of Looney is hardly new. Michelle's unsubstantiated and bitter view of the world is hardly new. Neither is grounded in fact. JLA

To: pezz who wrote (30451)	1/28/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<...principals no matter what others may say...>> and here's to ya pal for saying so. BTW I've heard plenty of statements of principle from JLA. In fact, over and over and over again he brings them up. Just out of curiousity, what principles are you, lorrie coey, and Michelle standing on? And could ya spare a bowl of rice for a y2k bro?

To: pezz who wrote (30451)	1/29/1999 8:28:00 AM
From: lorrie coey	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

Uh oh...looks like you've chaffed the self-appointed-alpha-males ego! Here's an example of why many males find it difficult to relate to females in a mutually beneficial way...the insecure males will gang up on any male who refuses to denigrate "femaleness" or who demonstrates, what they've deemed to be, an "inappropriate" amount of consideration or respect for Women... IMO, this is why we have a twice-elected president being "gang-banged" by the "majority". It's about maintaining the status quo...at any cost. Hillary threatens the hell outta the RRWC's...if they can't control a Woman...she becomes the vessel for all their insecurities If a Man refuses the "boys club" in favor of an *individual* identity, chances are that his alliegence to male society will be tested. If the pressure to conform is ignored...the group will humiliate the Man and make an "example" out of him to keep the others from following his lead...Just look at what's happening to Clinton because He R-E-F-U-S-E-D to submit to the prosecutors whims. Insecure men will punish secure Men who don't march in misogynistic-lock-step...this will really hold our species back in evolutionary terms. Things have changed since the neolithic period. You're a rugged individualist, pez. ps. KH looks radiant today!