Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jess James Gallegus who wrote (2893)	1/28/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: the truth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3335

Well, this private placement is no different than the other pp's. Although the company has more money to operate, one would have to wonder what exactly this bloody company is doing. Are they actually positioning themselves to grow in the future or is it a means to keep the books "looking" healthy for the next pump and dump. All I can say is, and CLK has mentioned this, is that the dilution of the sharebase is inevitably bad for all the guys trying to get value out of this play. Whatever, nothing significant here. This company just has nothing to show for all the pp's. I wonder how the VSE polices these kinds of companies. I wonder if they keep record of all the trading practices of ALL insiders and associates or do they turn a blind eye until someone makes a "stink." Never really thought of it, but could anyone here on this thread make a case to go to the VSE and have them review the trading practices of insiders and associates???? Could an ordinary shareholder go the VSE and find out who when and what house were trading this thing during the last run-uP???????? Who knows?? The last PP? What do I think?? Well, the company is still afloat, barely. truth