SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gnuman who wrote (47644)1/28/1999 8:10:00 AM
From: Bruce A. Thompson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571039
 
INTEL splits 2-1. (CNBC) <EOM>



To: gnuman who wrote (47644)1/28/1999 10:57:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571039
 
Gene,

A noble cause, as is Intel's

I agree with everything you wrote, except for the comment above. Intel knew that their competition doesn't have the ability to put cheap flash on a CPU die, and they saw this as an opportunity to shut out the competition. Similar to the PII bus/slot 1 ploy.

Scumbria



To: gnuman who wrote (47644)1/28/1999 12:11:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1571039
 
Gene - Re: " This further illustrates the need for Intel to remove the ID from the chip. There are other ways to insure transaction security. "

Why don't you tell Intel exactly how to do this - so that they won't make this "mistake" a second time.

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News