SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4851)1/28/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
 
This article is only an ad for a failed technology. Amati is trying to push it since they are under orders to make it go from TXN. This guy has got himself fooled into believing this bilge. Well, if you're selling MIBs and access concentrators, I can see why you want to make a splash out of it since that stuff is about the most expensive gear around. It crowds COs, and the nightmare mess that evolves out of attempts to scale will definitely bust fool telcos under orders like those promulgated by TXN from carriers like SBC.



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (4851)1/28/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Jay Lowe  Respond to of 29970
 
>> DSLAC or DSL Access "Concentrator," often employing an ethernet-like fabric

I see the difference. A DSLAM is DSL-in, ATM-out. A DSLAC is DSL-in, Ethernet-out. With assorted frills. Yes?

So a DSLAC is subject to contention on the Ethernet segment.

What are the corresponding bottleneck issues for ATM?

What are the tradeoffs for DSLAM and DSLAC on the way to the provider upstream edge?

All this is very interesting!

Yow! Am I DEBORED and UNJADED yet?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News